CVE-2025-39682 — Linux Kernel | CVSS 9.8 CRITICAL

CRITICAL

CVSS 9.8 CRITICAL  ·  EPSS 1%  ·  Linux Kernel

Severity Overview

Summary

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tls: fix handling of zero-length records on the rx_list

Each recvmsg() call must process either
– only contiguous DATA records (any number of them)
– one non-DATA record

If the next record has different type than what has already been
processed we break out of the main processing loop. If the record
has already been decrypted (which may be the case for TLS 1.3 where
we don't know type until decryption) we queue the pending record
to the rx_list. Next recvmsg() will pick it up from there.

Queuing the skb to rx_list after zero-copy decrypt is not possible,
since in that case we decrypted directly to the user space buffer,
and we don't have an skb to queue (darg.skb points to the ciphertext
skb for access to metadata like length).

Only data records are allowed zero-copy, and we break the processing
loop after each non-data record. So we should never zero-copy and
then find out that the record type has changed. The corner case
we missed is when the initial record comes from rx_list, and it's
zero length.

What the Attack Looks Like

If successfully exploited: A successful exploit grants the attacker elevated privileges on the target system — typically administrator or root — enabling full control of the affected host. Full confidentiality and integrity impact means an attacker can both read and modify sensitive data — useful for credential harvesting, data theft, or manipulating application state. High availability impact means the vulnerability can also cause a denial of service, which may be used for disruption or as a diversion during a broader attack.

Analyst Takeaway

The attack is launched over the network (remotely exploitable without physical access) and no authentication is required. This vulnerability is already in CISA KEV, which means exploitation has been confirmed in the wild — treat this as active risk, not theoretical exposure. The CVSS score places this in critical territory, so internet-facing systems and high-value assets should be prioritized for immediate remediation or compensating controls. Linux Kernel is associated with technology that is commonly deployed in enterprise environments, so defenders should assume a higher probability of broad target interest and prioritize validation across the environment. The ATT&CK mapping suggests public-facing exploitation risk, so external exposure validation should be part of immediate triage. The mapping indicates possible privilege escalation behavior, so local admin and kernel-level activity should be reviewed if compromise is suspected. In parallel with patching, defenders should review external exposure, hunt for signs of exploitation, and validate whether compensating controls are in place for vulnerable assets.

MITRE ATT&CK Mapping

• T1068 – Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
  Rationale: The vulnerability context indicates local or kernel-level privilege escalation behavior.
• T1190 – Exploit Public-Facing Application
  Rationale: The product appears likely to be internet-facing or commonly exposed in enterprise environments.

Detection Guidance

• T1068 — Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
  • Monitor for unexpected privilege changes, token manipulation, or process execution under SYSTEM or root that is not consistent with your baseline.
  • Review service creation (Event ID 7045), scheduled task creation (Event ID 4698), and kernel driver load events for unexpected entries.
  • Inspect EDR kernel-level alerts and OS-level memory protection violations associated with the vulnerable host or process.
• T1190 — Exploit Public-Facing Application
  • Inspect web server, reverse proxy, load balancer, and WAF logs for abnormal request patterns — unusual URIs, oversized payloads, HTTP verb abuse, or encoding anomalies.
  • Monitor for spikes in HTTP 4xx/5xx responses that may indicate probing or failed exploitation attempts preceding a successful hit.
  • Review outbound connections from affected servers for unexpected command-and-control callbacks or secondary payload retrieval to external IPs.
  • Validate which internet-facing assets are running the vulnerable version and verify whether compensating controls (WAF rules, network ACLs) are in place and effective.

Hunting Considerations

These are proactive hunts mapped to the ATT&CK techniques identified for this CVE. Run them now — do not wait for an alert to fire.

• T1068 — Exploitation for Privilege Escalation
  • Privilege assignment events (Windows): Search for Event ID 4672 (Special Privileges Assigned to New Logon) for accounts that should not hold elevated rights. Correlate with Event ID 4688 (process creation) to see what ran immediately after the privilege was granted.
  • Unexpected SYSTEM/root processes: Hunt for processes running as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM or root that are not part of your baseline — particularly interactive shells (cmd.exe, PowerShell, bash) or network utilities running at that privilege level.
  • Service and driver installation (Windows): Event ID 7045 (new service installed) and kernel driver load events are key. Privilege escalation exploits frequently install a service or load a driver as the escalation mechanism — any unexpected entry here warrants investigation.
  • Linux-specific indicators: Search auditd for unexpected setuid/setgid executions, sudo invocations by users outside your admin group, and privilege-change syscalls (setuid, setreuid, setresuid) from non-root processes.
  • Token manipulation (Windows): Sysmon Event 10 (process access) targeting lsass.exe or other high-privilege processes often precedes or accompanies privilege escalation. Unusual OpenProcess calls against security processes are a strong signal.
• T1190 — Exploit Public-Facing Application
  • Web/app server logs: Search for unusual HTTP methods, requests to non-standard paths, oversized payloads, or encoding anomalies (URL-encoded or double-encoded sequences) targeting the vulnerable application. Cluster by source IP and look for low-volume probing patterns before any successful hit.
  • Process telemetry: Hunt for child processes spawned by the web server or application process (e.g., apache2, nginx, w3wp.exe, java). Web server processes should not be launching shells, scripting engines (PowerShell, bash, python), or download utilities.
  • Outbound connections from the server: Alert on unexpected outbound HTTP/S or DNS from the application server to external IPs not in your CDN or update allowlist — this is a common secondary payload retrieval indicator post-exploitation.
  • File system writes: Look for new files written to web root directories, temp folders, or cron directories by the application process — especially scripts or executables placed there after an unusual inbound request.
  • Internal pivot follow-on: After gaining a foothold, attackers move laterally. Search for new internal connections originating from the compromised server in the hour following any suspicious external request.

Recommended Actions

Immediate (0–24 Hours)

• Inventory: Identify all systems running Linux Kernel. Include production, staging, dev, and cloud environments — untracked instances are the most likely to remain unpatched.
• Validate internet-facing exposure: Determine which of the affected systems are reachable from the public internet. Prioritize these for immediate remediation or compensating controls.
• Apply compensating controls now: For systems that cannot be patched immediately, implement temporary mitigations: restrict access via firewall rules or ACLs, add WAF rules if applicable, disable or isolate the vulnerable component if feasible without breaking critical operations.

Remediation

• Apply the vendor patch: Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.
• CISA directive deadline: 2026-09-21 — this is the mandatory deadline for US federal civilian agencies under BOD 22-01. All organizations should treat this date as a strong target regardless of federal mandate.
• Verify remediation: After patching, confirm the correct version is installed on all affected hosts. Run a vulnerability scan or use your asset management tooling to verify — do not rely solely on change tickets.
• Post-patch compromise assessment: Privilege escalation and lateral movement techniques can result in persistent access that survives patching. After remediation, review the hunting considerations in this alert to assess whether compromise occurred before the patch was applied.

Detection Coverage

• Verify ATT&CK coverage: Confirm your SIEM and EDR have detection logic in place for T1068, T1190. Review the Detection Guidance and Hunting Considerations sections of this alert for the specific log sources and behavioral patterns to monitor.
• Unauthenticated exploitation monitoring: Because this vulnerability requires no authentication, internet-facing scanning and exploitation attempts may begin within hours of public disclosure. Ensure alerting is in place before the end of the day.
• Threat intelligence feeds: Monitor your TI feeds and vendor advisory channels for published indicators of compromise (IOCs), proof-of-concept exploit releases, or active campaign reporting associated with this CVE — these should trigger an immediate hunt even if no internal alerts have fired.

Detection Playbooks

Vulnerability Details

Additional Notes

This vulnerability affects an open-source component, third-party library, protocol, or proprietary implementation that could be used by different products. For more information, please see: ; https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/2902c3ebcca52ca845c03182000e8d71d3a5196f; https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/c09dd3773b5950e9cfb6c9b9a5f6e36d06c62677; https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3439c15ae91a517cf3c650ea15a8987699416ad9; https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/29c0ce3c8cdb6dc5d61139c937f34cb888a6f42e; https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/62708b9452f8eb77513115b17c4f8d1a22ebf843 ; BOD 26-04: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk ; Forensics Triage Requirements: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/directives/bod-26-04-implementation-guidance-prioritizing-security-updates-based-risk ; https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39682